Unequal Under Law: Race in the War on Drugs

by Doris Marie Provine

Book Overview

Race is clearly a factor in government efforts to control dangerous drugs, but the precise ways that race affects drug laws remain difficult to pinpoint. Illuminating this elusive relationship, Unequal under Law lays out how decades of both manifest and latent racism helped shape a punitive U.S. drug policy whose onerous impact on racial minorities has been willfully ignored by Congress and the courts.

Doris Marie Provine's engaging...

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0226684628
• ISBN13: 9780226684628
• Release Date: October 2007
• Publisher: University of Chicago Press
• Length: 193 Pages
• Weight: 0.80 lbs.
• Dimensions: 0.6" x 6.1" x 9.1"

Customer Reviews

Race and the drug war

Race and the Drug War Randall G. Shelden November 8, 2009 According to the latest national figures, the incarceration rate of racial minorities continues to dwarf the rate for whites. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in June, 2008 the overall incarceration rate for black males was 4,777 (per 100,000) compared to a rate of only 727 for white males. Black females had an incarceration rate of 349 compared to 93 for white females. The rate for Hispanics fell in between at 1,760 for males and 147 the females. It reminds me of the phrase popular in the 1960s: "If you're white, you're alright; if you're brown, stick around; if you're black, stay back." When it comes to drug offenses, the rate differential is off the charts, with black offenders constituting up to 90% of prison admissions on drug convictions in states such as Illinois, Maryland, South Dakota and Utah (according to a Human Rights Watch study). Also, racial differences in the rate of drug offenders sentenced to prison are huge, with Illinois a prime example (a rate of 1146 for blacks and only 20 for whites). Nationally, the rate for black males for drugs is 482 compared to just 36 for whites. These are figures from the mid-1990s, but the most recent figures continue to show large racial disparities. For instance, a new report by the Sentencing Project (April, 2009) shows that of all the drug offenders currently in prison as of 2005, 43% were black, 32% were Hispanic and 23% were white. In the federal system 82% of all crack cocaine cases in 2006 were black. Another Sentencing Project report noted that "Between 1994 and 2003, the average time served by African Americans for a drug offense increased by 62%, compared with an increase of 17% for white drug offenders." (For more go to the following web site: [...] .) As surveys repeatedly show, there are few if any differences in illegal drug usage among the different racial groups. Many scholars have noted that these racial discrepancies have been in evidence for more than 100 years, dating as far back as the crackdown on opium among the Chinese in San Francisco in the late 19th century. It has also been noted that every major piece of anti-drug legislation has targeted drugs used mostly by minorities. In effect the history of the war on drugs shows convincingly that this has been a war on racial and ethnic minorities. The structure of racism is obvious. Yet despite this neither Congress nor the courts are doing anything to correct this disparity. This has been puzzling me for several years now and I have been wondering why this is. I have finally found an answer in what I consider to be one of the best - if not the best - book ever written on the subject of race and the drug war. Doris Marie Provine provides these answers in Unequal Under Law: Race in the War on Drugs (University of Chicago Press, 2007). She gets the reader's attention immediately on the first page of the introductory chapter with a cas