Understanding Ethnic Conflict: The International Dimension

by Rajat Ganguly and Ray Taras

No Synopsis Available.

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0321028953
• ISBN13: 9780321028952
• Release Date: January 1998
• Publisher: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers
• Length: 304 Pages
• Weight: 0.89 lbs.
• Dimensions: 0.5" x 6.3" x 9.1"

Customer Reviews

Understanding Ethnic Conflict

In "Understanding Ethnic Conflict", Taras and Ganguly talked about the cost of ethnic conflicts in the world. He emphasized on four major points: the cause of ethnic conflict, how does the international organizations react to it, why some ethnic conflicts become internationalized, and what can be done about the conflicts. The authors tended to give different answers accordingly to different conflicts. They claimed that not all conflicts are similar and not all conflicts can be applied to just single theory. In the book, they laid out different causes of each conflict. For example, the cause of conflict in Chechnya was from the history of suppression done by Russians to the Chechnya people. The conflict in Quebec is due to the differences in language barriers and cultural differences. As for conflict in Sri Lanka, the Sinhalese, who are the rulers, feared of losing power so they organized the nationalism idea. Taras and Ganguly also emphasized that one conflict drew international attention while others do not. For example, the conflict in Chechnya does not draw international attention because there are no interests for other states to risk being involved. But the Yugoslavia conflict drew attentions from international community because the two sides involved different civilizations. The writers also emphasized how important the third parties are to solving the ethnic conflict. The international organization such as the United Nations, major powers, regional powers, and international governmental organizations should be involved in settling disputes. They also criticized each organization such as the weakness of the United Nations for not having its own military.