The Tyranny of Tolerance: A Sitting Judge Breaks the Code of Silence to Expose the Liberal Judicial Assault

by Robert H. Dierker Jr.

Book Overview

As a judge, I have taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States. I cannot in good conscience sit idly by and watch the destruction of that Constitution by a judiciary that is no longer independent. Despite a tradition of silence by judges on such topics, I can no longer keep quiet about what I, as an insider, have seen happening in, and to, our courts. Once, the judiciary was a force for liberty, confining government within boundaries...

• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN: 030733919X
• ISBN13: 9780307339195
• Release Date: December 2006
• Publisher: Crown Forum
• Length: 276 Pages
• Weight: 1.20 lbs.
• Dimensions: 1.0" x 6.4" x 9.3"

Customer Reviews

A Needle of Truth out of the Haystack of Judicial Deception

Political Correctness is a passive aggressive form of tyranny but one of the most dangerous tyrannies nonetheless. It is passive because it is subtle and has the power to make its victims feel guilty for opposing it and thus easier to subjugate. It is dangerous because by the time we get fed up with it and decide to stand up to it most of the damage has already been done. The Judicial code of silence is just such an example of this damage. How can sitting judges, with more job security than most Americans can dream of, be bludgeoned into silence so easily? Nothing more perfectly demonstrates the tyranny of political correctness, masquerading as "tolerance." Judge Dierker as written a good book. He is bold and courageous for doing it and will no doubt suffer career ostracism, if not death threats, for it. He reminds me of the scientists who break their own code of silence to speak out on the hoax of anthropogenic global warming. The machinations of both of these elements of political correctness have the goal of transferring more control over the personal lives and finances of ordinary Americans to a government in the hands of the enemies of truth, justice and the oh-so-politically incorrect "American way." If you are one of those who is fed up with being pushed around and dictated to by mad power hungry moonbats this book is for you. It affirms that you are not alone.

Important conversation on a worthy subject...

I was enriched by this examination of the subtle and scary alteration of our constitution's intended separation of powers by the activist liberal judiciary of the past 50 years. A well written book from the constitutional strict-constructionist viewpoint. Dierker's educated and experienced insights are chilling and all too familiar. This book could be considered the non-fiction version of 1984!

APPLAUSE & PRAISE

If more good folks who love our constitution would stand up and not be scared of liberals who defile it, this truely honorable judge would not have to put his job on the line. Evil prevails when the good do nothing. Anybody who states that this book was wrote strictly for profit, I believe is a fool / illiberal liberal. My hat comes off for honorable judge Robert H. Dierker jr. Brian

No code of silence for public institutions.

Why should there even be a code of silence? If a code of silence is in place then it is because the Cultural Marxists in the Judiciary have something to hide. There are easier ways for a judge to get rich than to write a book like this, so to suggest there's a nefarious profit motive is absurd. Revealing to the public how intolerant, illiberal, radical feminists, socialists are turning a judicial system that should exist for the benefit of the community into a tool where those in power rule by force is nothing less than a public service and possibly to be a career killer for the Judge. They search me at the airport and tell me if I have done nothing wrong, then I have nothing to hide. Well, the same applies to the Judiciary but even more so, for individuals have a right to reasonable expectation of privacy, to be secure in their persons, papers, and effects; but the Judiciary, being a public instituiton, and the people associated with it, should be open to review and criticizm.