The Seven Days of Peter Crumb

by Jonny Glynn

Book Overview

Intelligent, wry, and seriously twisted, Peter Crumb is a man who suffers two personalities, only one of which is capable of remorse. His life has been derailed by a single, devastating act of violence, and now, in what he intends to be his last week on earth, he is determined to leave his mark upon humanity--randomly, unjustly, with infinite attention to detail. Allowing the morning's newspaper headlines to loosely dictate his actions, Crumb sets...

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0061351482
• ISBN13: 9780061351488
• Release Date: December 2007
• Publisher: Harper Perennial
• Length: 240 Pages
• Weight: 0.45 lbs.
• Dimensions: 0.6" x 5.5" x 8.0"

Customer Reviews

if you are into psychosis and psychological tendencies..

read the book, "The seven days of Peter crumb" The book really brings the issue into perspective from someone with multi-personalities and psychosis.. The thing about this book is that it is able to give a mysterious Edgar Allan Poe feel to it that gives a the speaker a vindicated reason of being perverse. A lot of what Peter Crumb (protagonist) does in the book is Perverse but his reasoning is given, although it is unjustifiable .... it still is a reason even thought Peter is delusional... Read this book, it is interesting if you are a Chuck Palanuik fan... It has the same grotesque descriptions.. the same unfamiliar and insane instances.. the fear and horror like Edgar Allan Poe's tales... and brings you to look at a different perspective. Because the narrator does not limit what he tells the readers, he seems to be honest and really does give out a lot of information so you can bring things into your own perspectives.... The story doesn't limit or control interpretations like Edgar Allan Poe's stories. Just give it a try. It's a new British author, you might like it. Its a crazy story.

Crumb not crummy

If you didn't know better, you would think this book were written by Chuck Palahniuk, author of Fight Club, Choke & Rant. It is very in your face, with a lot of gross out scenes and twisted dark humor. If you like the above books, this is right up your alley. Peter Crumb, a seemingly moral British man, has a voice in his head that tells him to engage in insanely immorale acts. Crumb's split personality is with him 24/7 and at first, they constantly argue over everything. The voice refered to as "him" is highly disturbed and he is right right there with Peter in his head throughout the story. The internal conflicts almost always end in the killer getting his way. Bloody murders and rapes are "his" favorite past-times and "he" becomes a terrible influence on Crumb. The reason for the title is that this split personality plans on killing its host body at the end of seven days. Glynn's storytelling is superb. My only real critiques fall in super long paragraphing in places and in that the end is a little abrupt. Oterwise, this is a great quick read for people who like horrific content with a touch of gross-out humor.

fascinating in a macabre way psychological thriller

In London Peter Crumb has recently begun listening to the other voice's recommendations. The conversations between Peter and the other Peter center on whether to rape and murder his neighbors. The other Peter insists he will be dead in a week anyway so forget the societal dictates of thou shall not kill and just have fun doing whatever you want to do. Peter begins brutally killing his neighbors and raping prostitutes. As he completes one act, his voice tells him to do another. He begins to self analyze the two Peters and realizes that one is amoral while the other feels guilt but is cowardly. The amoral Peter continues to rule as THE SEVEN DAYS OF PETER CRUMB comes closer to ending at least in one of his egos with much of London in shock by the viciousness of a new serial killer rapist. Readers will find the debate and discussions between the two Peters fascinating in a macabre way; similar to gawking at a car accident. His multiple personality disorder contains a remorseful but weak Peter and an amoral strong Peter who wins every argument as one kill leads to another. Even more interesting is how numb the audience feels towards the duel Peters graphically describing his methodology employed in his kills in the three decades since John Carpenter directed Halloween. Harriet Klausner