The Most Exclusive Club: A History of the Modern United States Senate

by Lewis L. Gould

Book Overview

The Senate was originally conceived by the Founding Fathers as an anti-democratic counterweight to the more volatile House of Representatives, but in the twentieth century it has often acted as an... This description may be from another edition of this product.

• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0465027784
• ISBN13: 9780465027781
• Release Date: October 2005
• Publisher: Basic Books (AZ)
• Length: 402 Pages
• Weight: 1.60 lbs.
• Dimensions: 1.1" x 6.5" x 9.5"

Customer Reviews

Good and informative (but has its flaws)

While there is no shortage of books on Presidents and the Presidency, and quite a few on the Supreme Court, it seems that the legislative branch is a bit neglected. That's not to say that there aren't some good books on individual Congressmen (especially the big names such as Clay, Webster and Calhoun), but the institution seems to be the least chronicled of the three branches. With The Most Exclusive Club, Lewis Gould tries to fill this void with a history of the Senate from 1900 on. Why the beginning of the 20th century as a starting point? There are probably two reasons, although Gould doesn't really develop them. For one thing, this period chronicles what Gould would call the Modern American Presidency (in his book by the same name, which goes from McKinley onward). Secondly, by starting in 1900, we see the last years of the "old" Senate that was composed of members chosen by state legislatures and the whole period of the "modern" popularly elected Senate. Unlike the President and Supreme Court which can - to some extent - define themselves, the Senate, as Gould describes it, is more defined by its relationship with the President. Perhaps that is because so many Senators aimed for the Presidency as their ultimate goal, with the Senate as a mere stepping stone; ironically, this is not the best way to become a President; only Harding and Kennedy were able to go from the Senate to the Presidency in the 20th century, and history is littered with more ill-fated Senators (most recently, Kerry and Dole, plus all the many who weren't even nominated, like Gephardt or McCain). Gould's history is pretty chronologically straightforward. Most of the chapters are either broken down by historic events (such as the Depression or World War II) or by certain Senate figures (such as Joseph McCarthy or Lyndon Johnson). He does a good job at highlighting some obscure but important Senators and demythologizing others (like Johnson or Robert Taft). Generally, he keeps things objective until the last couple of chapters when Gould's politics begin to really show; there's a lot he says that I can agree with, but his views transform the book from a history to an opinion piece. Removing Gould's politics, there is an important idea that is communicated here, namely that the Senate has transformed considerably over the years, and not necessarily for the better. At one time, the Senate could be counted on for its more deliberate nature: with members serving six year terms, there wasn't a constant obsession with holding onto a seat. Senators, rightly or wrongly, could act with less concern of immediate political effect. Nowadays, there is perpetual campaigning, and the Senate is more like the House of Representatives in its behavior. Although Gould thinks that the "old days" are overly romanticized, he feels that the current Senate is worse and no longer serves the function it once did. Is this a good book? Yes, although Gould's writing is a bit stiff at

Let's hope new U.S. Senators can overcome the shameful past described in these pages

Lewis L. Gould paints an unflattering portrait of the United States Senate from 1900 to the present. This lively and comprehensive history should be of interest to all Americans who care about the upcoming 2006 elections and the future of our political system. Gould, a historian from the University of Texas Austin, serves up many delicious quotes about the worst character traits of modern Senators. He directs particular scorn upon rampant alcoholism, naming several of the Club's most inebriated members. Gould pulls no punches to expose their other unpleasant tendencies: protectionism in trade policy; isolationism in foreign policy; racism in civil rights; and obstructionism of every kind to protect parochial interests. Far too many Senators from the "modern" era have succeeded only in lowering the bar for their successors, judging by this latest historical account of their behavior in office. One enduring history lesson from this period: the biggest grandstanders and publicity hounds often leave the smallest mark in terms of lasting legislative legacy. Low-key Mike Mansfield, on the other hand, emerges as the most revered of the modern Senate Majority Leaders. An entire chapter is devoted to bipartisan accomplishments, in both foreign and domestic matters, achieved under the Montanan's distinguished, but quiet, leadership. Men from small Western states like Montana seem to thrive in the Senate backrooms where, like Mike Mansfield, they can have an impact on U.S. history disproportionate to their home state's population. History buffs will find much to like in these pages. Gould's narrative draws more heavily from diaries and private correspondence than from the Congressional Record. Widows speaking after their late husbands' deaths provide the volume's most sensational quotes. This would explain why our incumbent senators are largely spared individual criticism in these pages. For those wishing more, the notes are extensive and the author provides a bibliography for each decade. This highly readable history should leave most readers hoping that better years lie ahead for the U.S. Senate. The "men's club" that ruled over the U.S. Senate for most of the last century is at last breaking up. A brand new Senator, entering this chamber with sound principles and vision, could quickly make a positive impact on our nation's public affairs.

U.S. Senators Won't Like this Book, but It's an Important Work that tells the Story, Warts and All

Like many people in late 2005, I have been watching the HBO series, "Rome," and noticing the role of the Roman Senate in the collapse of the republic to be replaced by Julius Caesar's empire. "The Most Exclusive Club" is a capable, relatively short anecdotal history of the U.S. Senate in modern America. This Senate's relationship to its ancient Roman namesake is more than just coincidental. In Gould's telling, the modern U.S. Senate, like its Roman predecessor, had its share of corrupt politicians, dedicated public servants, power brokers, and reprobates. Both groups shared the authority and responsibility of high office in a time of crisis and transition. Both senates also found themselves under the control of a powerful chief executive, and while Caesar was a tyrant who did not have to stand for election, at various times in the twentieth century the United States Senate also contended with an "imperial presidency" that demanded obedience of the Senate. That is certainly the case of the most recent post-9/11 era. This is an important book that traces the history of the Senate throughout the twentieth century and into the first years of the twenty-first. In it we see the institution evolve as differing concerns rise and subside, as crises come and go, and as personalities change and the forces of political will shift. One of the my favorite sections of the book deals with Lyndon B. Johnson, whose leadership was one of domination and browbeating on both members of his own party and on the Republicans. He accomplished much before leaving the Senate for the vice presidency in 1961, but he also left an institution in disarray. Gould is also excellent in his discussion of the issue of divided government, that is, the control of the Legislative branch by the party not in control of the White House. That division helped ensure an effective check on runaway political power. This division has not been present in recent years, leading into a discussion of the Senate's recent past. IGould's analysis of the Senate decided lack of backbone in opposing the war in Iraq, despite the misgivings of many of its members, is both enlightening and provocative. This is a breezy read and a valuable consideration of this important body in the twentieth century United States. One cannot understand the recent political situation without appreciating the roles of the various organizations of government and how they interact. "The Most Exclusive Club" helps to decipher the role of the Senate in this set of relationships.