Interviews focusing on the last century take a look at history from the standpoint of the ordinary people of the country. This description may be from another edition of this product.
"The Future of History" is an enlightening read if you agree that Marxism is the direction this country should be heading in. And even though Zinn's historical zeitgeist struggles to pedagogically be the proverbial elenchus to capitalism. Zinn's objurgation of capitalism is flawed simply because capitalism and communism both possess diphasic properties, which make them quasi-economic paradoxes. So, in putting this argument to rest it becomes elementary; there are no absolutes when discussing forms of government and economics. For example: Capitalism/Oligarchy: is when the corporation controls the government, which in layman's terms means fascism/dictatorship. Communism/Socialism: is when the government controls the corporation, which means dictatorship. I know many socialists will disagree with me on this subject simply because they believe that the citizens will have the final say insofar as controlling the socialist government in question. Unfortunately the way the governmental mechanism works is when people are appointed to run the institution/country. Suffice it to say, these governmental leaders will be the ones running things on the surface. Of course, we all have to realize that the money-trust will always run things from behind the scenes no matter if it's a communist dictatorship like China, or a capitalist dictatorship like the United States. Which means that the so-called world leaders will always capitulate to the billionaire banksters if we don't wake up and exert some leverage. Either way you slice it capitalism in its extreme form is just communism under a different guise, and there isn't anyway around that argument. Anyway, in the book (radio talk-show host) David Barsamian interviews Zinn on a number of issues such as the satiety of the U.S. government and how this derision has hurt us as a society over the years. Zinn even addresses the issue that I raised at the beginning of this review, and if you feel the need to agree with him...fine... that's your prerogative, it's still a free country even though its misguided. Moreover, Zinn responds to a comment that was made by Clinton's former Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich when he said, "the jury is still out on whether the traditional union is still necessary for the new workplace." Howard Zinn responds by saying, "I'm disappointed in what Robert Reich had to say about not being sure about the function of unions. He should have known better." It just goes to show you where the Clintons stand on that particular issue. Personally, I like most of what Zinn has to say it's just his Marxist views I have a problem with. I also like how he inculcates poetry and art into his work/thesis by quoting individuals such as Langston Hughes. Zinn is also not ashamed of demonstrating the importance of U.S. history from the Black perspective as well as women, and other minority groups that tend to be left out of the discourse. In that respect it makes his historical outlook vit
ThriftBooks sells millions of used books at the lowest everyday prices. We personally assess every book's quality and offer rare, out-of-print treasures. We deliver the joy of reading in recyclable packaging with free standard shipping on US orders over $15. ThriftBooks.com. Read more. Spend less.