This book is a scathing critique of the work of N.E.S.A. Hamilton, who challenged the authenticity of the annotations in the famous Shakespearean scholar J. Payne Collier's annotated edition of the Shakespeare Folio 1632. The authors, Alexander and Charles Rivington, mount a rigorous defense of Collier's work, arguing that Hamilton's claims are unfounded and that Collier's annotations are of great historical and literary significance. This...