The Rights Retained by the People: The Ninth Amendment and Constitutional Interpretation

by Randy E. Barnett

Volume II of The Rights Retained by the People explores how the Ninth Amendment affects the proper way of interpreting the Constitution as a whole.
Contributors: Sotirios A. Barber, Michael W. McConnell, Sanford Levinson, Stephen Macedo, Andrzej Rapacznski, Thomas C. Grey, Lawrence G. Sager, Morris S. Arnold, Earl M. Maltz, Susanna Sherry, Calvin R. Massey, Thomas McAffee and Raoul Berger.
Together with Volume I, which covers...

• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0913969443
• ISBN13: 9780913969441
• Release Date: March 1993
• Publisher: University Press of America
• Length: 350 Pages
• Weight: 2.00 lbs.
• Dimensions: 1.4" x 6.3" x 9.1"

Customer Reviews

A superb collection

Since there is little product info on this book, the first thing I want to do is give you a table of contents: Introduction: James Madison's Ninth Amendment by Randy Barnett 1. Speech to the House explaining his proposed Amendments with notes for the Amendments Speech by James Madison 2. The "Higher Law" Background of American Constitutional Law by Edward S. Corwin 3. The Ninth Amendment of the Federal Constitution by Knowlton Kelsey 4. The Forgotten Ninth Amendment by Bennett B. Patterson 5. Are there "Certain Rights...Retained By The People"? by Norman Redlich 6. Natural Rights and the Ninth Amendment by Eugene M. Van Loan, III 7. The Ninth Amendment by John Hart Ely 8. The Ninth Amendment by Raoul Berger 9. On Reading the Ninth Amendment: A Reply to Raoul Berger by Simeon C.R. McIntosh 10.The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment by Russell L. Caplan 11.Federalism and Fundament Rights: The Ninth Amendment by Calvin Massey 12.On Reading and Using the Ninth Amendment by Charles L. Black, Jr. Appendix A. Roger Sherman's Draft of the Bill of Rights (the Bill of Rights as they came out of Committee to be approved by Congress and sent to the States for ratification) Appendix B. The various Amendments to the Constitution proposed by some of the State Ratifying Conventions (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Virginia all submitted suggestions for amendments as nonbinding parts of their ratifications. North Carolina and Rhode Island refused to ratify until the Bill of Rights was ratified.) Appendix C. Justice Goldberg's Concurring Opinion in Griswold v. Connecticut. Enough of that. To whatever extent, if there is a revival of interest in the Ninth Amendment and its meaning, it is due to the work of Barnett, and the writings in this book. Goldberg's opinion in Griswold indicated the possibility that the Ninth could be used as the foundation for the right to privacy among other possibilities. That set off a debate in legal circles. This book deftly follows the history of that debate (it is largely chronological in sequence) and outlines the main positions. Barnett's introduction is worth the price of admission alone. The is the first book of his that I have read. He is, I believe, arguing from a libertarian point of view which is not mine. I have to admit that the logic of his argument is quite compelling. He sums up the arguments throughout the articles and clears up some of the confusion surrounding the definition of natural rights, its relationship to positive law and to what extent the Founders intended the Federal government to protect unenumerated rights either from itself or the states. I found all of the articles to be very well thought out with the exception of Berger's who gives a reading of the Ninth that I can only call perverse. Berger seems to feel that the Ninth outlines an area of "no-power", i.e., the Federal government can neither diminish nor protect those rights retained by the p

Rights That Are Retained but Not Listed in the Bill of Rights Except in the Ninth Amendment

RIGHTS RETAINED BY THE PEOPLE edited by Randy Barnett is a good anthology of papers examining the Ninth Amendment and what are known as unenumerated rights or those rights not specifically listed in the US Constitution(ratified in 1787)or the Bill of Rights (ratified in 1791). Until 1965, the Ninth Amendment was never an issue in the U.S. Supreme Court when the Supreme Court Justices used the Ninth Amendment to overturn a stupid Connecticut law outlawing seeking or prescribing birth control methods or medicine. The background to the successful appeal of the Connecticut law took place when a physician was arrested and convicted for prescribing birth control to a married couple. His conviction was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court and the Connecticut law was overturned by a 7-2 decision. Then Chief Justice Goldberg concurred with the majority who basically argued that the Connecticut law violated Fourth Amendment protections of unreasonable search and seizure. Interferring with husbands'/wives' decisions re family planning is NONE of the government's business. The Ninth Amendment got attention in this case when Justice Goldberg used the Ninth Amendment to concur. Basically Justice Goldberg argued that family planning and whether or not parents decide to have children are unenumetated rights. His arguement contended that marriage, the size of a family, etc. were unenumerated rights and protected by the Ninth Amendment via the Incorporation Doctrine of the Fourteenth Amendment. Since then, the Ninth Amendment has received attention from Constitutional historians and legal scholars. The title of the 1965 Supreme Court case was Griswald vs. Connecticut. One wonders why a prosecutor would even take such a stupid case. Another interesting case along similar lines was Loving vs. Virginia(1967)whereby a married couple in Virginai were arrested and convicted for violating a Virginia law forbidding mixed race marriages. They were told to spend prison time or leave the state. The Lovings in effect said, "None of the above" and appealed their case to the U.S. Supreme Court whereby the Virginia statute was overturned by a 9-0 U.S. Supreme Court deicsion. The Ninth Amendment was used in part the Supreme Court's reasoning in this case. Mr. Barnett did not just deal with these cases. He examined James Madison's thought re the Bill of Rights and the Ninth Amendment. This is interesting reading. Madison and those who supported him had to deal with fact that not all rights could be including in any constitution or bill of rights. Some of these rights existed in the Common Law, and the Ninth Amendment was intended to protect these rights. Prof. Corwin's views was the best paper in this anthology. Corwin did a detailed examination of what may be called unenumerated rights, and his research and piece are solid. Those interested in unenumentated rights would find Corwin's inclusion in this book informative and useful. Prof. Berger's piece in ths book is the worst. A

Judicial enforcement of unenumerated rights?

The second volume of a two volume set, "The Rights Retained by the People," edited by Georgetown University Law Center Professor Randy Barnett, is a compilation of essays and law review articles on the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The text of the Ninth Amendment: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people," is simple enough. The meaning, interpretation, and application of the Ninth Amendment, especially through the act of judicial interpretation, is a much more complicated matter. The articles in this volume adddress this complexity. Until the Griswold decision in 1965, the Ninth Amendment had not been formally invoked as the basis for a Supreme Court decision. Today, particularly in the legal academic community, the Ninth Amendment has become a focal point for judicial activism. Articles are included from all perspectives of the political spectrum. For a layperson interested in constitutional issues, this two-volume set is an excellent source for an ideologically wide-ranging introduction to the modern approach to constitutional interpretation. The articles include historical discussion, as well as legal discussion, and provide an excellent basis for the consideration of whether judicial restraint or judicial activism is the appropriate means of consitutional interpretation. Professor Barnett has recently published an excellent book, "Restoring the Lost Constitution," which continues the discussion primarily from a libertarian perspective.