Racetrack Betting: The Professors' Guide to Strategies

by Peter Asch

A day at the races, with its colorful variety and fact-paced action, appeals to people from all walks of life. Not surprisingly, the idea of going home with a few more dollars than when one arrived is part of horseracing's charm. In this entertaining but substantive volume, two distinguished economists, who happen to be horseracing buffs, outline a tested strategy for placing bets that will increase the reader's chances of a happy outcome at the track...

• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0865691479
• ISBN13: 9780865691476
• Release Date: January 1986
• Publisher: Greenwood Pub Group
• Length: 195 Pages
• Weight: 1.05 lbs.
• Dimensions: 9.8" x 0.8" x 6.5"

Customer Reviews

This is a syndicated column I wrote about this book

How to Pick a Kentucky Derby Winner When your sitting back In your rose pink Cadillac Making bets on Kentucky Derby Day -Rolling Stones As the son of a son of a gambler, people ask me for betting advice. Although I started going to race track before I was able to walk, I don't know that much about the horse industry. I go the track a few times a year and bet small amounts. Most of my equine knowledge was gleamed when I worked on the clean up crew at the Kentucky Horse Park. I can tell you what horses make the biggest mess. Although there are people more qualified to give Derby tips, like political or financial commentators, I won't let lack of expertise stop me. I came to the conclusion in the mid 1980's that I wanted to live my life in Kentucky, I needed to know how to bet on horses. I found a book called Racetrack Betting: The Professors' Guide to Strategies by Peter Asch and Richard E. Quandi. It was written by two statistics professors and not the easiest book to read. I can sum up the advice in two statements. 1. Bet on the horse that everyone else is betting on. 2. Bet on the horse to show, not to win or place. The book bases the ability to pick horses on a theory known as the wisdom of crowds. The wisdom of crowds concept is really popular now. It is a driving force for web sites like Google. The idea is that marketplace will move towards the best outcome. If a horse moves from 10 to 1 to 2 to 1, it is probably a good horse to bet on. Betting to show is a practice that I follow religiously. . The professors said that betting to show will produce a winner 52% of the time. That is better than any other kind of bet. The professors hate jackpots like the Pick-6. Just like the lottery, big odds draw a lot of excitement and attention. Just like the lottery, you don't see many people winning them. The professors frown on exactas, daily doubles or any bet that exhibits large risk. Like in the investment world, the winner at race track is the person with a conservative style and discipline. When I go to the track, I don't look at the racing form, jockeys, past history or pick horses with funny names. (My mother was a sucker for horses with funny names.) I just follow the odds. I usually win enough money to pay for lunch. My father, a professional gambler, absolutely HATED my betting system. He and I would go to Keeneland every session and we never picked the same horse. He would bet $100 on a horse and lose. I would bet $10 and win. It drove him absolutely crazy. Dad liked the excitement of big odds and big payoffs. He knew everything about the horse's past performance, their breeding and who was riding them. Dad was superstitious and started to believe that my system was jinxing him. If dad ever met the professors, he would have punched them in the nose. I stuck to my system. I stick to it today. Betting to show fits with my overall philosophy about investing. S