Poets Thinking: Pope, Whitman, Dickinson, Yeats

by Helen Vendler

Book Overview

Poetry has often been considered an irrational genre, more expressive than logical, more meditative than given to coherent argument. And yet, in each of the four very different poets she considers here, Helen Vendler reveals a style of thinking in operation; although they may prefer different means, she argues, all poets of any value are thinkers.

The four poets taken up in this volume--Alexander Pope, Walt Whitman, Emily Dickinson, and...

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 067402110X
• ISBN13: 9780674021105
• Release Date: April 2006
• Publisher: Harvard University Press
• Length: 160 Pages
• Weight: 0.45 lbs.
• Dimensions: 0.5" x 5.6" x 8.0"

Customer Reviews

Our most eloquent poetry professor on four great English language poets

I have long enjoyed and appreciated the helpful, brilliant and clear writings of Professor Vendler, opening to even my poor understanding the means and meanings of our great poets, including The Art of Shakespeare's Sonnets which bears a CD of her reading of the sonnets, selected. In particular I read intermittently her unmatchable volume length study of Irish poet Yeats entitled Our Secret Discipline: Yeats and Lyric Form, so reasonable, so measured, so close to her subject with affection and intelligence. For instance, see her discussion there of the poem of Leda and the Swan, and compare this with more gender-political readings, and gratefully acknowledge her scholarly approach. So I was drawn to this present volume, simply for the section on Mr. Yeats, and discover so much more, in Dickinson, Whitman and Pope, poet I might otherwise overlook but here find deeply revealed. Professor Vendler does require the attention of her reader as she reveals why these poets reward our greatest and most careful attention. She serves as a fine, generous and meticulous guide to the treasure concealed. Perhaps she may best be read within the context of an advanced course in English literature, of the sort no longer offered, with the loving, living presence of a patient, tireless and resilient professor, but such a dream may no longer be, and we are blessed by this book in hand, and the chance to read and to read once more the words of this great and patient professor of our poetry, armed with The Oxford Companion to English Literature or similar reference such as the Bennet for understanding the full meaning of the terms used here, terms which would have been acquired in lower level courses, terms we might not yet have upon the tip of our fingers, but which are essential for our comprehension, terms which are good to know. Kindly, Professor Vendler brings us into this secret garden, this hidden world of knowing our literature, with great patience and delight, and we are fortunate to find her wonderful work so distilled in this slim volume. Caution is given elsewhere to pursue the New Edition of 160 pages, not the 2004 first printing, which I have now. Above all else, read the work, the poetry, grateful for all that this good professor reveals to us within, clearly, correctly, cogently. Please see also her study of Irish poet Seamus Heaney and her anthology of poetry, etc.

Surprise! Poets are thinkers!

Vendler is very entertaining--she truly holds her reader and gets us right inside the poems themselves. That's rare among today's literary critics, an almost forgotten way of thinking about poetry. "Even when a poem seems to be a spontaneous outburst of feeling, it is being directed as a feat of ordered language, by something one can only call thought. Yet in most accounts of the internal substance of poetry, critics continue to emphasize the imaginative or irrational or psychological or 'expressive' base of poetry; it is thought to be an art of which there can be no science." She goes on to illustrate for us what "poetic thinking" actually is with illustrations from some of our greatest poets. Readers of my reviews will know of my enthusiasm for Vendler's commentary on Shakespeare's sonnets The Art of Shakespeare's Sonnets as well as my appreciation for Emily Dickinson as shown in my reviews of The Poems of Emily Dickinson: Reading Edition and The Cambridge Companion to Emily Dickinson (Cambridge Companions to Literature). Vendler's treatment of Emily Dickinson is especially interesting. The great crisis in Dickinson's poetry happens when her instinctive practice of serially filled in chromatic advance encounters unavoidable fissure, fracture, rupture and abyss. And what an opening this provides Dickinson! Vendler guides us through the opened up strategies Dickinson employs in "After great pain, a formal feeling comes" (372; 1862); "Before I got my eye put out-" 336; 1862) and many other great poems. She is at her best, I think, in her treatment of "Renunciation - is a piercing Virtue" (782; 1863). Poets have what they refer to as "moves," or ways of handling particular situations that come up in the writing of poetry. William Stafford has "moves" and he talks about them frequently in his writings on poetry. Some of the very best "moves" are the ones Dickinson makes--and certainly Yeats as well. Vendler as a critic is very sensitive to this. She is always on the trail and looking for the "moves" a poet is making. Vendler's looks are convincing, even though she may not be the last word on everything and she may not always get everything exactly right. With a good deal of literary criticism today you as a reader want to scream: "Stop! Read the poem you nitwit!" Thank the stars, there's Vendler.

Not an Easy, but a Rewarding Read

I can't believe this book hasn't been reviewed yet. I found it a very thought-provoking insight into the techniques of these four poets. I particularly enjoyed the analyses of Whitman and Yeats, with the Pope and Dickinson running close second. This is not popularized dumbed-down literary criticism, but a rigorous examination of substantive issues. You will get out of it what you put into it. Pope: His caricature devices include synecdoche, diminutive nicknames, scientific reduction (gold is yellow dirt), classical allusion, anticlimax (wisest, brightest, meanest), and word substitution (damned to everlasting [condemnation] fame). Whitman: One of his devices is to state things reportorially, and then to restate them from a position of extreme empathetic identification with the things described, shifting from an emphasis on verbs to an emphasis on nouns; narrative incident turns to lyric description. Dickinson: She gives the semblance of control by dividing a process into a series of arbitrary slots which she fills with detail, e.g a poem about a train's journey makes several stops at certain places, but other possible places it could have stopped are not mentioned. Vendler labels this "chromatic linear advance." Early on there was a definite ending in her poems, but this became more ambiguous as she got older. Also, things went from being ordered chronologically to being ordered in an emotional hierarchy. Yeats: Overlayed images to present a vertical harmony of choral unison. Here's a typical Vendler sentence: "Yeats's bitter diptychs, though presented serially, are contrived so as to assemble themselves ultimately into a densely overwritten palimpsest." He frequently moved a single poem's mode from narration to meditation to an ode. That's about 120 pages of densely overwritten Helen Vendler in a nutshell.