Naturalism and Religion

by Kai Nielsen

No Marketing Blurb This description may be from another edition of this product.

• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN: 1573928534
• ISBN13: 9781573928533
• Release Date: October 2001
• Publisher: Prometheus Books
• Length: 506 Pages
• Weight: 2.00 lbs.
• Dimensions: 1.7" x 6.4" x 9.3"

Customer Reviews

A solid collecton of essays

Note: This review will come in several installments, as I'm busy with other reading assignments. I've given the book four stars because it's comprehensive and I agree with much of what I've read. In Naturalism and Religion, atheist philosopher Kai Nielsen defends a naturalist (and therefore atheistic) view of the universe. He tries to show what a life in such a universe should be like and seeks to argue so forcefully for his position that anyone who reads the book shouldn't think bad about naturalism but, instead, should think a naturalist something desirable to be. The Introduction sums up Nielsen's goals for the book (see above). It's also a nice commentary on the state of religious belief in the world. The Introduction was very funny, too. Here are some quotes. "In a recent survey taken in the United States, 88 percent of the population (if the sample taken was accurate) maintained that they never had any doubts about the existence of God. Even if this survey is innacurate and this is true of only forty percent of the population, it is still an intellectual and moral disgrace--a disgrace that should be a scandal in the United States." Speaking of the political right, Nielsen says: "If the Pat Buchannans of the world should triumph, we would be led into outer darkness where life would indeed be nasty, brutish, and perhaps even short or at least shorter, but nasty and brutish, certainly. I am very glad that I have secular-humanist colleagues who take up this good fight and that there are journals such as Free Inquiry that take on such Neanderthals. I should think for an intellectual that would be a very wearisome and boring Sisyphean task indeed, but still a task that must be done." And of fundamentalists: "These fundamentalists do have their philosophical spokespersons (more likely spokesmen), e.g. William Lane Craig and J.P. Moreland. They have learned tecniques of the contemporary philosophical trade and deploy them to defend fundamentalism....But rank and file fundamentalists will not read us (atheists). I speak of those people who would close down abortion clinics, make the death penalty freely available and availed of (remember Bush's record in Texas), make sure evolution is not taught in the schools, make 'creation science' a regular part of the science curriculum, ban the inclusion of 'evil books' from the public school curricula and from public libraries, shut gays and lesbians down (get them, since they will always be with us, firmly back in the closet), and halt the influence of liberals (to say nothing of socialists) on our cultural life. They, of course, will be glad to hear that there are those great philosophers out there--J.P. Moreland and William Lane Craig--who have uterlly refuted those evil atheists with their barnyard moralities. But they will not, to any considerable extend, read Moreland or Craig, let alone us. They will just go on in their Neanderthalish and oppressive ways. Only occasionally when some individua