Jazz for Beginners

by Ron David

This informative introduction to jazz follows the development and the personalities of this uniquely American music form. It explores all of the elements that combine to create jazz and takes an... This description may be from another edition of this product.

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0863161650
• ISBN13: 9780863161650
• Release Date: January 1995
• Publisher: Writers & Readers Publishing
• Length: 156 Pages
• Weight: 0.66 lbs.
• Dimensions: 0.4" x 6.0" x 9.0"

Customer Reviews

This review from 'American Music Teacher' magazine captures my book perfectly

A Review by Tony Caramia, from the American Music Teacher magazine 'Jazz for Beginners might be a mislead­ing title in a magazine like American Mu­sic Teacher. It is not a method book instructing beginning students on which lick to play in a blues progression; nor does it show how to harmonize a song with fancy jazz harmonies. Rather, it is a book written for the adult who knows nothing about this most unique, American contribution to the musical landscape of the twentieth century. Jazz for Beginners outlines each of the major periods of jazz's development, "from the brassy opti­mism of Dixieland, through the fierce dignity of Bebop, onto the fusion of Jazz-Rock and Jazz HipHop." 'This book is a "Beginners Documen­tary Comic Book," and as such contains many fine pictures, etchings and drawings of the jazz musicians, instruments, places and recordings described. In addi­tion, the author provides a kind of running commentary throughout the narra­tive that, although occasionally bordering on the opinionated, helps to maintain the personal (and frequently humorous), style that eventually endears one to the book and the subject. For example: on each page, David asks questions (set in boldtype) that he then answers, such as "Aren't there any MALE Jazz Singers?" His answer: "Yes, of course...but nobody's sure who they are! Joe Williams is a blues singer. Or Jazz singer. Or both? (Whatever the hell he is, he's good!)." The language used in the book is true, fundamental, of the street and uncensored. It is not "dirty" or offensive; it is real, unfiltered, emotional and heartfelt--like the music it describes. 'David sprinkles quotations from jazz critics, musicians, magazines, record jackets and other jazz books on virtually every page, lending an interesting and eclectic format to his narrative; we get historical fact mixed with fiction, contemporary perspectives ultimately proven inaccurate like, "Bebop has set music back 20 years." 'I was fascinated by this book, its bold and riveting statements, its unbridled attempt to humanize the music, and to define jazz as more than a series of musical sounds. The author suggests that "Listening to a great Jazz solo is the closest I will ever get to being in a room with Einstein when he flashes on his Theory of Relativity...I am there with him at the moment he is creating it." There are many moments of profound insight, deeply personal observations from the author and the musicians who created the music, as well as those who participate in its ongoing evolution. This is a book for serious musicians, for open-minded individuals who seek knowledge and intellectual stimulation. Most importantly, this book is for those who strive to understand human beings as they struggle to survive and grow. Jazz is a music that, for so many, provides a means for self-expression, an outlet for the intense pain they feel. This book graphically and poignantly depicts their heroic efforts.' Reviewed by Ton

A History that Under-stands History as Rhetoric

It's funny. It also takes the subject by the horn(s). The passion of this music needs a voice that understands that you cannot build the house of jazz history with the master's tools...so it takes a different approach to the history, one that uses the "for beginners" form as a way of talking politics. That makes this volume essential for a basic understanding for what is at stake in the history of jazz. This is what Ken Burns (and my old friend Wynton) need as a corrective. No, I don't agree with all of it...but that outcome should always make one suspicious...