Indefensible: One Lawyer's Journey Into the Inferno of American Justice

by David Feige

Book Overview

"Indefensible is public defender David Feige's hair-raising, dark, and stirring account of a single hot day in the South Bronx - a day informed by crime, punishment, desperation, and hope. Following Feige through the underworld of big-city justice, we meet sly lawyers and batty judges, hapless defendants and crooked cops, lost souls and courageous giant-killers." "Indefensible reveals the brutal underbelly of a system out of control. Racing from courtroom...

• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN: 031615623X
• ISBN13: 9780316156233
• Release Date: June 2006
• Publisher: Little Brown and Company
• Length: 276 Pages
• Weight: 1.12 lbs.
• Dimensions: 1.0" x 6.7" x 9.5"

Customer Reviews

An excellent indictment of the criminal justice system

I am not fond of criminals. Nor can my politics be considered left-wing. However, I do believe in the Constitutional right to due process and David Feige's "Indefensible" shows how Americans are routinely denied this right without a whimper from the elitist liberals and their mainstream press pals. Steve Bogira tried showing the nature of the criminal justice system in his "Courtroom 302" (Courtroom 302: A Year Behind the Scenes in an American Criminal Courthouse, but that came out sounding like a left-wing whine blaming everyone except the lawbreaker. Feige was a public defender in New York for more than 15 years. He tells the story of those years with a touch of humor, an understated admission of the psychic pain he suffered as the system ground down defendants, their families and their lawyers, while elevating and protecting incompetent (if not corrupt) judges, prosecutors and police. His story has the ring of truth. He talks about innocent people railroaded into pleading guilty just to escape the system. Of evil judges who gave no second thought to wrecking families and lives. (He names names.) He doesn't resort to the usual left-wing nostrums of blaming society, demanding more money to perpeptuate dependent welfare or any of that. By simply stating the facts from his perspective, Feige makes a strong argument for thorough reform of the criminal justice system. Right now the system isn't concerned with justice, but simply keeping itself going. As I said, I have no sympathy for actual criminals and it irritated me a bit to read of Feige negotiating down sentences of robbers and murderers. My attitude toward them is more like lock them up and throw away the key. But Feige reminds us that every criminal defendant has unalienable Constitutional rights - and that these rights are being violated day in and day out in New York's criminal courts. (Bogira attempted to make the same point about Chicago.) More than likely the same can be said for any criminal court system in America. The system is dysfunctional and doesn't work. So plea bargains are the currency of the day. Society suffers because bad people come back to the streets to soon. But innocent people suffer too, denied a trial, forced into pleas that may harm them or even ruin their lives. It's a lousy system, far from the promises of the Constitution, and one that must be reformed on every level. Feige makes his points without beating the reader's head against the wall and he makes them effectively. He doesn't make any left-wing, criminal-coddling arguments: he doesen't have to. His experiences as a public defender, representing the truly guilty, the innocent and just those whom life dealt a bad hand to are all that's needed to waken your conscience to the miscarriage of justice we call our criminal justice system. Jerry

FANTASTIC

'Indefensible' is brilliant. Feige is a very talented writer with gripping subject matter. I don't know how to describe the difference between great writing (which is rare) and writing that isn't good (which is everywhere). But I know it when I read it, and this is it. Feige completely transports the reader, you are there with him, and all the senses are engaged. You smell the urine, vomit, and the stench of homelessness. You taste the fried, fatty fast food that is the only eating option in the vicinity of the courthouse. You hear the yelling, the crying, the footsteps on the tile floors. You see the ill-fitting, second-hand suits, the inventive hairstyles of the projects. You feel the touch of the crowds, the cold air outside, the interminable wait for the elevator, the sexual tension with an ADA (in the elevator!). The book reads better than any legal fiction and obviously, because it is true, has much more emotional impact. I can't count the times (mostly in the first half) that I laughed out loud. Absurdities abound, and he front-loads the book with the funny stuff. It's a good strategy, because once you're lulled in, he really socks it to you. In one simple story of trying to get through the endless line for the metal detectors (just to enter the courthouse), he tells of the court officers confiscating a sandwich from a homeless woman - the only food she has to eat that day. After trashing her sandwich, she begs them to let her go through and not have to re-enter the line and wait another hour, they eject her anyway. She's lost her place in line, most likely lost her all-important court appearance, and she's lost the only food she would eat that day. We have all been victims of capricious abuses of power by small, cruel people who delight in upsetting other people's lives just for the heck of it, or even just robotic rule-followers who wreak havoc when they could just as easily think for themselves but inexplicably just refuse to do so. Think about all the times you've been bumped from a flight for no good reason, forced to sit in some random airport for 6 hours, missing your connection, losing your bags. Think about the blank face of the airline worker behind the counter, not answering your questions but telling you to sit down and stop bothering her and avoiding looking straight in your face. Think about how angry you get, how you feel abused and powerless. Multiply that by a hundred-thousand, when the result isn't being late for a wedding or funeral or a meeting, but the possibility of losing your family, livelihood, home and freedom, that is being put in PRISON. Showing people what really goes on, what is a daily fear and struggle for all poor people and disproportionately for people of color is not liberal or conservative, it is just truth-telling, and in this book it is out-right entertaining and inspiring. This book will make you angry and indignant, and you will think that there is nothing you can do again

Criminal Justice from the Outside In

Indefensible offers a picture of the world of criminal justice from a man who knows it well. David Feige started his career at the age of 20 working as an investigator and summer intern for a public defender's office in Washington, DC . After law school and a brief tenure at a glamorous corporate law firm in New York City , Feige decided that the streets were where the action is and that criminal defense was his passion. He returned to the world of criminal defense and has been there ever since. Feige works for the Bronx Defenders and represents destitute clients. Indefensible takes us to Riker's Island jailhouse, and to courthouses in the South Bronx, where Feige tells us of the great struggle of defending clients against the justice system - a system that will use any means at its disposal to break them down psychologically and morally, and to make them pay the price, in some cases for minor infractions or for crimes they did not commit. Indefensible defies public perceptions of the criminal courtroom as a place of rational argument, where defendants enjoy their constitutional right to a jury and the standard of reasonable doubt is upheld. At least for the indigent, the reality is quite to the contrary, and the system is remarkably adept at depriving them of a trial and a jury. Feige says that most of his clients are guilty. However, many are not, and it is not uncommon for the innocent to enter guilty pleas in cases where fighting the monstrous system will only make matters worse. In the South Bronx , minorities and the poor are constantly at risk for harassment and arrest by the police, even for minor offenses (e.g., open liquor, or hopping a broken subway turnstile) that are routinely ignored by the authorities in more affluent areas. As Feige tells it, thorough investigation is the most important component of a building a successful defense case. In his current state of seniority, Feige assigns the investigative work to less senior staff members, whom he trains in investigative techniques. The intimidating questioning style employed by the police has no place here, and charm, friendliness, fearlessness, and the ability to listen to others is what leads one to the facts. Indefensible pulls no punches, and Feige is quick to tell us about individual judges and ADA 's and their distinct styles. Oftentimes the character of the judge or ADA can make the difference between acquittal and conviction. Some are reasonable and others are absolutely relentless and cruel, and Feige gives us a character sketch of a few notable individuals. In spite of the great frustrations of fighting a system that often appears insuperable, Feige maintains his sense of humor and upbeat style. These traits shine through in the work and make Indefensible an entertaining read. Others have faltered in this area, and we learn of one defense attorney who in desperation broke down in court and shouted obscenities at the judge. Feige openly admits that, in spite of his se

"Law without the cuff links."

David Feige's "Indefensible" will infuriate those who believe that society should lock up all the criminals and throw away the key. Feige was a public defender in New York City for over a decade, and he actually liked his job. In fact, he cared so much about his clients that if he believed that he let them down in any way, he reproached himself mercilessly. Feige did everything in his power to get the men and women who entrusted their future to him the best deals possible, whether or not they were guilty. He listened to their side of the story, tried to provide the social services they needed, and always treated them with respect. Does this make David Feige a bleeding heart liberal? Some may think so, but others might see him as person of compassion, pragmatism, and strong feelings about the meaning of justice. This book is an account of a day in the life of a public defender in the Bronx Criminal Courthouse. Surprisingly, although Feige changes the names of his clients, he reveals the identities of judges, prosecutors, and defense lawyers. Since Feige openly criticizes some of these officers of the court for incompetence, unfairness, and unethical behavior, it took courage for him to name names. Feige's client list included rapists, drug dealers, murderers, and prostitutes. Yet he judged each case on its own merits, and never treated his clients like cogs in an assembly line. For example, when Feige conferred with a woman named Cassandra, whom he eventually got to know over a period of years, he said, "There are people you meet in my job who are so helpless, so hopeless, and so sad that it slices your heart up...." Cassandra was a homeless and suicidal drug addict. Although she was overweight, unkempt, and unreliable, David did whatever he could to make her life more bearable. Whether he defended an innocent bystander wrongfully accused of murder, a woman who killed her abusive husband, or a convicted rapist charged with homicide, Feige never functioned on autopilot. He ran around day and night, meeting with clients, making phone calls, talking to judges and other lawyers, grabbing fast food, and sleeping for a few hours whenever possible. As he got older, he shared his valuable knowledge and experience with the younger lawyers in his office. One of the highest compliments I can pay this book is that it reads like a novel. Feige's powerful descriptive writing and hilarious anecdotes beautifully evoke the teeming and chaotic atmosphere of the Bronx Criminal Courthouse, and the author gives us an incisive portrait of law and order, New York style. He demonstrates that although there are many savvy and responsible lawyers, there are also those who are lazy and indifferent. In addition, although many judges are impartial, efficient, and evenhanded, others are uncaring, sadistic, and misguided. To keep from getting burned out as a result of his high pressure job, David heeded the sound advice he received from Paula Deutsch, a "hard-drinking

Should be required reading for law students and lawyers, and you, too.

As a recent law school graduate and practicing criminal defense attorney, I was thrilled to read a book that exposed to the general public the frustrations that I find in the criminal justice system. The writing style made this one of those books that I was unable to put down, except for the few times I had to stop reading due to the frustration I felt over learning what happened to individuals caught up in NYC's system, and then reflecting on how it can be even worse in Texas, where I work. It was refreshing to read a book where criminal defendants are portrayed as actual human beings, as opposed to the one-sided "bogeyman" type view that shows like Law & Order, the nightly news, and other media sources constantly feed us. I'd love to see this concept turned into a primetime tv drama.