Federations

by Lois McMaster Bujold, George R.R. Martin, John Joseph Adams, et al.

Book Overview

Edited by John Joseph Adams, editor of Wastelands and The Living Dead. From Star Trek to Star Wars, from Dune to Foundation, science fiction has a rich history of exploring the idea of vast... This description may be from another edition of this product.

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 1607012014
• ISBN13: 9781607012016
• Release Date: January 2009
• Publisher: Prime Books
• Length: 379 Pages
• Weight: 0.90 lbs.
• Dimensions: 1.1" x 5.4" x 8.4"

Customer Reviews

good space operatic anthology

In many ways, I've started to come to believe that you can't go wrong with a John Joseph Adams' collection. Wastelands: Stories of the Apocalypse was incredible, The Living Dead was great, and Federations...? Also very very good. The "dust jacket description" of this anthology pretty much sums it up... It collects a few different modern takes on the classic science fiction trope: What does it take; what does it mean for a civilization to be interstellar and/or pan-galactic? My take of Federations, it gets a composite rating of 3.9130 (individual stories below) * "Mazer in Prison" (Orson Scott Card): 3/5 » About what you'd expect from Card. So it doesn't disappoint but it doesn't exactly thrill, either. * "Carthago Delenda Est" (Genevieve Valentine): 4/5 * "Life Suspension" (L. E. Modesitt, Jr.): 2.5/5 * "Terra-Exulta" (S.L. Gilbow): 3/5 » Reminds me a bit of that Stephen King piece that opens Wastelands. The letter-writing format is a tough one to write in and I appreciate the effort here. And I don't dislike this piece but it seems... too short? or just that its hand is tipped too early and that kind of blows the ending a bit? * "Aftermaths" (Lois McMaster Bujold): 4/5 * "Someone is Stealing the Great Throne Rooms of the Galaxy" (Harry Turtledove): 2/5 » Not terribly intriguing, and a little puerile/juvenile. To me... I can see why it was included (for the variety and for the perspective it brings) but it just doesn't do it. Not for me. * "Prisons" (Kevin J. Anderson & Doug Beason): 2.5/5 » So much potential, and almost good; but why did I wind up feeling like it needed to be more subversive? (E.g., so many heteronormative relationships!--if the prison revolt leader had been lovers with another man, well now maybe that might have been a little more intriguing.) * "Different Day" (K. Tempest Bradford): 5/5 * "Twilight of the Gods" (John C. Wright): 4/5 » The Tolkien-esque language can be a little off-putting at first but it really starts to make sense after you get about a third of the way in. * "Warship" (George R. R. Martin and George Guthridge): 5/5 » I can't imagine why it took so long for Martin to shop this piece--unless Guthridge really brought that much to it. The execution is very spot-on. * "Swanwatch" (Yoon Ha Lee): 4/5 » I want to like this more. It's beautiful but a bit oblique--and that's fine but somehow it doesn't jump to where it needs to be. * "Spirey and the Queen" (Alastair Reynolds): 5/5 » Awesome. Did you like Watts' Blindsight? Did you like Sterling's "Swarm"? A little bit like that. (Only robots.) * "Pardon Our Conquest" (Alan Dean Foster): 3.5/5 * "Symbiont" (Robert Silverberg): 4.5/5 » Highly disurbing; more so than I thought it would be. (Just read this one; skip the introduction.) * "The Ship Who Returned" (Anne McCaffrey): 4/5 * "My She" (Mary Rosenblum): 4.5/5 » Brilliant. Nicely subversive and almost perfect. * "The Shoulders of Giants" (Robert J. Sawyer): 2.5/5 * "The Culture Archivi