A New Birth of Freedom

by Charles L. Black Jr.

Book Overview

Widely recognized as one of the greatest constitutional thinkers of our time, in the 1950s Charles Black joined Jack Greenberg, Thurgood Marshall, and others in crafting the arguments in Brown v. Board of Education. Here Black offers the clearest and most powerful constitutional argument for a national commitment to human rights.

• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0399142304
• ISBN13: 9780399142307
• Release Date: June 1997
• Publisher: Putnam Adult
• Length: 175 Pages
• Weight: 0.80 lbs.
• Dimensions: 0.8" x 5.8" x 8.8"
• Age Range: 18 years and up
• Grade Range: Postsecondary and higher

Customer Reviews

Describes the "legal" process of moral dehumanization.

Professor Black has written a thin book that carries an invaluable moral message for America. This message especially may help any one who would limit ethical concerns to such traditionally biased concepts as "family values" or narrowly conceived meanings of "Christian" love. See for example, Dee Brown's (1970, 1991) account of American history in, "Burry My Heart At Wounded Knee." Revelations in that book shocked and angered a number of students who read it recently in a class titled, "Race, Gender, and Corrections." A typical comment was, "Why did I have to get into my senior year of college of learn this? I was always told that the Indians were the bad guys."From a legal perspective, an excellent companion volume for Professor Black's book is A. L. Higginbotham, Jr's. (1996), "Shades of Freedom: Racial politics and presumptions of the American Legal Process." Both books focus on an ominous "legal & quo! ! t; process in American law that can best be described as dehumanization, or more accurately, "double dehumanization." See especially chap. 4 in A. J. Vetlesen's, 1994, "Perception, Empathy, and Judgment: An Inquiry into the Preconditions of Moral Performance," (e.g., p. 180)). Also see Susan Opotow's analysis of "moral exclusion" and the "scope of justice" and Michelle Fine & L. Mun Wong's discussion of "Perceived (In)Justice," in "Conflict, Cooperation, & Justice," (1995), edited by B. Bunker, J. Rubin, and Associates.The only weakness I see in "A New Birth of Freedom" is that Professor Black too narrowly frames his analysis by focusing on the "Slaughterhouse Cases" of 1871. Many other cases are quite relevant as Higginbotham (1996) and a host of scholars show. For example, prior to our uncompleted unCivil War there was the case of Dred Scott v Sanford (1857). More recently, by 6-3 the ! ! U.S. Supreme Court (in City of Boerne v Flores, Bishop of S! an Antonio, and United States, 1997) struck down the legal and human rights concept of "unalienable" (religious) rights that Congress had reaffirmed in the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. Orlando Patterson (1991, pp. 404-405) in "Freedom in the Making of Western Culture" accurately traces this dehumanizing flaw in America ( & Nazi Germany) back to ancient Greece and idealized philosophers such as Plato.The most fertile ground for understanding the "legal" process of dehumanization that concerns Professor Black probably is in the area of prisoners' rights and the domains known as "criminal" and "juvenile" justice. See the book edited by Elihu Rosenblatt (1996), "Criminal Injustice: Confronting the Prison Crisis"; Human Rights Watch's (1996), "All Too Familiar: Sexual Abuse of Women in U.S. State Prisons"; and Jerome Miller's (1991) classic on juvenile injustice, "Last One Over the Wall. & ! ! quot; On a much needed positive and promising note of valid "moral justice," see: John R. Fuller's (1998), "Criminal Justice: A Peacemaking Perspective"; Daniel Goleman's (1995), "Emotional In